Free sample lesson · Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern

What Is Self-Reference?

What happens when a sentence talks about itself?

Lesson 1 of the Wondering course Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern

When Words Point at Themselves

Most sentences talk about the world. The sky is blue describes something outside itself.

Self-reference happens when a statement, structure, or system refers back to itself.

Take This sentence has five words. Its subject is the very sentence you are reading. Count them: it is true.

What is the sentence about?
  • Ordinary statement
  • Self-referential

Self-reference works like a mirror held up to language. Sometimes the reflection is harmless. Sometimes it creates a puzzle.

Direct and Indirect Self-Reference

Self-reference comes in two forms.

Direct self-reference points at itself in one step. This sentence is in English uses the words this sentence to name itself.

Indirect self-reference loops back through other statements. Sentence A says Sentence B is true. Sentence B says Sentence A is false.

Neither sentence names itself, yet each one ends up talking about itself through the other.

Two routes back to itself
  • Self-reference: Refers back to itself.
  • Direct: Points at itself in one step.
  • This sentence is in English
  • Indirect: Loops back through other statements.
  • A: B is true
  • B: A is false

Not Every Mirror Breaks

Self-reference does not automatically cause trouble.

This sentence has five words is simply true. This sentence is in French is simply false, since it is written in English.

Each has one stable answer. You check it, and you are done.

The danger appears when a statement talks about its own truth. That is where the potential for paradox lives.

Harmless or paradox?

The Liar Paradox

Here is the most famous self-referential sentence: This statement is false. It is called the Liar Paradox.

Suppose it is true. Then what it says holds, so it is false.

Suppose it is false. Then what it claims is wrong, so it is true.

The reasoning that never ends
  • Assume it is true: Then what it says holds.
  • So it is false: It says it is false.
  • Its claim is wrong: Being false means its claim fails.
  • So it is true: And we are back where we started.

Every answer flips into its opposite. The reasoning never settles.

A Logical Impossibility

You might try to label it true or false and move on.

But logic normally demands that every statement be one or the other. The Liar fits neither option without contradicting itself.

Try to pick an answer
  • This statement is false
  • Is it true?
  • Then it is false: What it says holds.
  • Then it is true: What it claims is wrong.
  • Contradiction: Neither option works.

This is a logical impossibility, created by a sentence talking about its own truth.

Common mistake: blaming vague wording. The sentence is perfectly clear. The self-reference causes the clash.

Why Thinkers Still Care

The Liar Paradox has puzzled philosophers for millennia.

Thinking hard about it led to revolutionary discoveries in mathematics and logic. It reveals limits of formal systems, sets of exact rules for reasoning.

If clear rules can produce a sentence they cannot judge, those rules have limits.

Self-reference also touches the mind. When you think about your own thinking, you are pointing back at yourself.

Can a mind fully judge itself?

Spotting Self-Reference Yourself

You can test any statement with a quick check.

First, ask what it is about. If it points back at itself, directly or through a chain, it is self-referential.

Next, assume it is true, then assume it is false. If one answer holds steady, it is harmless.

If both answers flip, you have found a paradox like the Liar.

The self-reference check
  • Find the subject: Ask what the statement is about.
  • Look for self-pointing: Check if it refers to itself, directly or through a chain.
  • Assume true: See whether that answer holds steady.
  • Assume false: See whether that answer holds steady.
  • Judge: If both answers flip, you have a paradox.

Check yourself

Card 1 says: "The sentence on Card 2 is true." Card 2 says: "The sentence on Card 1 is false." Neither card mentions itself. This pair of sentences refers to itself _____

  • indirectly, because each card points to the other in a loop
  • not at all, because neither card talks about itself

Answer: indirectly, because each card points to the other in a loop

Self-reference can be indirect. Card 1 points to Card 2, and Card 2 points back to Card 1, so the pair loops back on itself. A sentence does not need to say "this sentence" to be self-referential.

Think about the sentence "This statement is false." If we assume it is true, then what it says must hold, so it is _____. If we assume it is false, then what it says is wrong, so it is _____.

Answer: Think about the sentence "This statement is false." If we assume it is true, then what it says must hold, so it is false. If we assume it is false, then what it says is wrong, so it is true.

The liar sentence flips its own value. If it is true, it must be false. If it is false, then its claim of being false is wrong, so it must be true. Each guess leads to the opposite.

Which of these sentences is self-referential?

  • This sentence has five words.
  • The sky is blue today.
  • Paris is a city in France.
  • Water boils when it gets hot.

Answer: This sentence has five words.

"This sentence has five words" talks about itself, so it refers back to itself. The other sentences talk about things in the world, such as the sky, Paris, or water, and not about the sentence itself.

Keep going

This is lesson 1 of 30 in Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern. Next up:

  1. Strange Loops in Art and Nature
  2. Constructing Self-Reference
  3. Viral Sentences and Memes
  4. Nomic and Self-Amendment
  5. Number Numbness

Start this course free

Wondering turns any topic into short lessons you can read, watch, or listen to, with practice questions and an AI tutor.